新唐

灼言丨“反转”何以一再上演_我的网站

一 |     The Biden administration is drafting a $100 billion foreign aid package that includes assistance for Israel as well as other top security priorities, according to two people familiar with the details.Details on the spending request were still being finalized ahead of an official request sent by the White House to Congress this week.One person told ABC News that the “bulk” of the assistance will likely go toward Ukraine, while others also said that it included $10 billion for Israel. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity in order to discuss details that hadn't been announced yet by the White House.The request comes as President Joe Biden travels to Israel in a show of unity with the Jewish state following the brutal Oct. 7 attack on civilians by Hamas terrorists from Gaza.On Capitol Hill, Senate leaders suggested Tuesday that such a sweeping aid package would find support among lawmakers."We'd like to get the supplemental package moved as quickly as possible because the needs are great in both Israel and Ukraine," said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York.Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said he would support bundling aid for Ukraine and Israel and that he expects the administration to include money for border security, too."The border part of it needs to be credible, not just some reference to it but a credible deal," he told reporters.Bloomberg was first to report the $100 billion total.The aid proposal for Israel follows extensive discussions between the two countries, with Israel appearing to opt -- at least for now -- against a massive ground invasion of Gaza, even as international groups accuse Israel of worsening a humanitarian crisis by not allowing food or water into Gaza and cutting off electricity.Behind closed doors, Biden officials have grown deeply worried about hardliners within Israel pushing for a scorched-earth military response that wouldn't do enough to prevent civilian casualties, according to a senior administration official who spoke on condition of anonymity. At one point this week, aides believed that only the president himself could convince officials there that allowing humanitarian aid in Gaza would be in their country’s best security interests.When asked about those discussions, White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said they’re not telling the Israeli military how to operate and that civilians should be protected. At the same time, following the law of war is critical and something Biden has pressed Israel on, he said.“Since almost the very, very beginning here, we have been talking about how important it is for democracies, like Israel and the United States, to stand up for the law of war, to respect innocent civilian life, unlike Hamas. So this is a foundational element of the discussions that we've had with the Israelis for forever, and we'll continue to do that going forward," Kirby told ABC's "Good Morning America."Following lengthy meetings earlier this week between Secretary of State Antony Blinken and his Israeli counterpart, the two allies seemed to have reached some kind of consensus. Details of the aid package are now circulating among U.S. officials as Biden is en route to the region.Budget experts say Israel’s assistance needs aren’t likely to be urgent due to a 2016 agreement that provides Israel $3.8 billion a year over 10 years. More pressing, they say, is Ukraine, which has run out of long-term funding as it seeks to fend off Russia.Some House Republicans have questioned the need for more U.S. aid to Ukraine. By tying Ukraine and Israeli aid in a single legislative package, the White House would make it harder for GOP hardliners -- who are staunch allies of Israel -- to reject it.Pro-Israeli groups have also called on Biden to include at least $500 million in grant funding for Jewish communities in the U.S. to protect synagogues and other community sites due to threats. It was not immediately clear if that request was part of Biden’s aid package as of Tuesday.ABC's Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Martha Raddatz and ABC reporters Justin Gomez and Shannon Crawford contributed to this report.。    来源：【闪电新闻】又见反转。近日，针对备受关注的“吉林大爷救助重庆游客反遭诬陷”事件，重庆市公安局渝北区分局发布警情通报称，经查阅音视频材料，询问导游、现场目击证人等，初步查明，彭某、雷某不存在网传的“诬陷”情况。看到这一通报，不少网民惊呼“又见反转”。同一个事件，前后两地的通报为何截然不同？这样的反转对于我们观察舆情事件有何启示？01对于这样的反转，不少人并没有表现出更多的惊讶，甚至有人调侃，这是“熟悉的配方，熟悉的味道”。确实，近年来，我们看过了不少的“反转”。山西“阴阳刀削面”、“Thurman猫一杯”寒假作业事件、“胖猫”事件、“点读机女孩”高君雨事件、“鼠头鸭脖”事件等等。社交媒体时代，受众的注意力逐渐被分散在大量简短的信息片段中，也使得受众更容易忽略新闻的深度、可信度等因素，尤其看到吉林大爷救助游客却被诬陷这样一种强烈的对比情节时，很容易被愤怒情绪左右，在缺乏理性思考的情况下做出过激反应。梳理这些新闻事件，就会发现不少是因为自媒体为了博取流量，利用碎片信息，刻意夸大或隐瞒部分事实，借助网民情绪进行夸大传播、无良炒作，甚至捏造事实混淆是非。网络不是法外之地，对于这些违规违法行为，主管部门必须实施严厉惩处。

二 | 02当然，不能把出现反转式传播的原因全部归结于部分不良自媒体的“骚操作”。事实上，官方通报也有可能翻船，出现反转。此次“吉林大爷救助重庆游客反遭诬陷”事件，以及此前的江西“鼠头鸭脖”事件就是典型的代表。对于自媒体翻车，不少人不以为怪。但是，在很多人眼中，官方的通报具有很高的权威性，对于事件的定性往往起到一锤定音的作用。

三 | 官方主导着舆情事件的调查，代表着政府部门的公信力，发声、通报也有相应的流程，实在不应该“翻车”。事实上，官方通报被“反转”并不奇怪。官方通报翻车，反映出部分地方在舆情应对方面存在短板，这主要表现在两个方面。一是，一些地方对舆情尤其是负面舆情过度敏感，患上了“舆情焦虑症”。一旦涉及本地的相关话题冲上“热搜”，不论是大事还是小事，只要跟本地有关，只要有舆情，就坐卧不安，心神不宁，时时有“被架在火上烤”的焦灼感。二是，一些地方“功利心”过重。当下，文旅产业对于拉动消费刺激经济发展，发挥了重要作用。

四 | 很多地方都把打造城市IP，发展文旅产业当成重点工作来抓，想方设法提高城市曝光度，增加城市名誉度。在这种急切心态之下，好事固然要宣传好，遇到“坏事”也可能因为目的先行，导致了对事件的误判。在“舆情焦虑症”和“功利心”的作用之下，遇到舆情事件，第一反应往往不是调查情况解决问题，而是急于“灭火”，先把舆情消除了再说。于是，调查变得可有可无，凭目测就能得出鼠头是鸭脖的结论；在看了一段监控视频，没有找到目击证人的情况下，也能得出游客倒地与李某无关的结论，把他包装成珍视城市形象，热心助人的好人形象。有了“舆情焦虑症”和“功利心”的双重夹击，官方的调查也有可能带着有色眼镜开展，原本应当深入展开的调查也有可能浮于表面，据此得出的结论做出的通报，即便是翻了车，也不奇怪。03反转的新闻事件频频发生，也给公众提了一个醒。网络舆论是一把双刃剑。营造清朗的网络空间，维护理性、宽容的舆论环境，对于每个人都是利好，也离不开每个人的配合与参与。面对热点事件，我们还是应当保持宽容与理性，尤其是在面对单信源新闻事件时，不论事件多么劲爆，多么让人义愤填膺，都要保持一分冷静，尝试从多角度多层次对事件做出分析。而不是一点就着，一看就骂，允许当事人做出辩解，鼓励他们合法、合理的途径解决问题。

五 | 这是网络时代，文明网民应有的素养。面对舆情事件，政府部门也应该处置有度。充分了解并尊重传播规律，发声要快更要准，发出的通报要建立在全面调查的基础上，确保经得起审视，如此才能真正起到一锤定音的作用。如果尚未展开全面调查，没有掌握事情的全部真相，就该宁慢勿快，坚持有一分证据说一分话。文/靖晓红 新南本文来自【闪电新闻】，仅代表作者观点。全国党媒信息公共平台提供信息发布传播服务。

Current article:http://www.diaoengngtengdiachanpiezao.sbs/7zj/vmo.xlsx

Published on:18:03:05